HCI574 - Spring 2010 - postmortem

Now that the first run of the course is nearly over, I'll be collecting thought on what worked/didn't work, etc. from my perspective:


TextBook: 4th ed. has a lot of detail (an a lot of pages!) in areas that I don't think I ended up touching much.  I think it's well written but I really wish it were still on the ~ 700 page level as the 3.ed is or it would have two parts. I understand it (currently) has to be a book on Python 2.6 and 3.x and that it is going beyond what I do in the course, so for the student it's an investment for the (near) future. However, I  may be looking at a using the 3. ed or a different text book for next year or make buying it optional.

Other python book: http://pragprog.com/titles/gwpy/practical-programming

Student-Student code "review":
I was planning to have students look at other students code and could not fit it in.  Should do a "just look at another student's code" around HW 3-4 and a formal "test and evaluate" of the final project

From additional feedback:

  • Midterm: give a week's time (not just a few days)
  • HW less specific
  • (Need a better reference for python?)


Blog on teaching python (same guys as the practical-programming book):
http://pyre.third-bit.com/blog/archives/2834.html

Pygame ebook:
http://www.spielend-programmieren.at/pythongamebook/doku.php?id=en:start

No comments:

Search This Blog